Introducing the Open Guide to Kanban (July 2025)

In July 2025, a new document was published to complement the existing Kanban Guide (May 2025) - the Open Guide to Kanban. This Guide is open for community feedback and adaptable. It offers guidance and deeper clarity for applying Kanban in the context of knowledge work.
decorative

Why was this document created?

Despite the growing adoption of Kanban across industries, many implementations have reduced it to a simple task board or a visual to-do list. The Open Guide responds to this by highlighting that Kanban is a full system: a pull-based, flow-optimized approach rooted in theory and practice.

It also reflects collective learning from diverse communities and feedback from practitioners who use Kanban in complex, non-manufacturing domains such as software, healthcare, operations, finance, education, and many more.

Who is this document for?

The Open Guide targets professionals engaged in knowledge work, where value is delivered through thinking, collaboration, and decision-making rather than repetitive tasks. It is relevant to Kanban and Agile practitioners, product managers, analysts, operations teams, and leadership looking to establish or evolve Kanban systems beyond a task board.

It is also a reference for trainers, consultants, and communities seeking a shared, precise vocabulary around Kanban.

Some changes and improvements

Compared to the May 2025 Kanban Guide, the Open Guide to Kanban introduces:
 
  • A broader and more contextual set of flow metrics, including:
    • Blocked Elapsed Time for Finished Items (BETFI)
    • Cumulative Queueing or Buffer Time (CQBT)
    • Flow Efficiency
    • Flow Distribution


In the document, you will find additional metrics that help teams identify bottlenecks, assess systemic delays, and gain a better understanding of how long it truly takes to realize value.
 
  • A stronger focus on outcomes and value realization — encouraging teams not only to track delivery speed and outputs, but also to measure if the delivered work meets stakeholder needs. Concepts like Validated vs. Invalidated Value, Time to Validated Value, and Failure Demand are central to this shift.
  • A shift in tone: from minimalism and constraint to open, contextual guidance — while maintaining the core Kanban practices: defining and visualizing the workflow, actively managing it, and continuously improving it.

Remember, your context defines needs. The majority of practices or metrics are optional. You may consider using them when it’s appropriate.

In closing

I had the opportunity to contribute to the development of this guide as part of an international group of practitioners. It was a great experience to co-create something that aims to support teams and organizations in using Kanban more purposefully and effectively. Having this opportunity here, I would like to express my gratitude to John Anthony Coleman for inviting me to this initiative.

I warmly encourage you to read the full document — it is openly available to the entire community:
https://kanbanguides.org

Additionally, you may share your ideas and feedback here: https://github.com/KanbanGuides/OpenGuideToKanban/discussions

If you’d like to explore how to apply it in your context — from product teams to leadership workflows — I’d be happy to continue the conversation.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

More To Explore

batna

Using BATNA in Product Management

If you have worked in product management long enough, you know that not every conversation ends in full agreement. Priorities shift, pressure comes from different directions, and decisions don’t always fit easily into the plan. Every Product Owner should understand BATNA – the Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement.

Read More »
decorative

The Art of Negotiation in Product Management – Webinar

Negotiation is an important part of Product Management. And not only. Whether we realize it or not, we negotiate every day with stakeholders, teams, customers, and even ourselves. The challenge? Negotiation in Product Management isn’t about deciding who is a winner. It’s about working through different priorities and perspectives, finding common ground, and making the best choices for the product, the business, and the customers.

Read More »